To the extent that Sony actually hates crossplay, it stems from the fact that it gives them control over how their customers access their media. This is a huge deal as it gives them the ability to make certain choices that they wouldn’t otherwise have. For example, they could make it so that media would only be available on their channels (although, again, it’s not to say that they wouldn’t still be able to access Netflix).

It is a huge deal, but I think it’s worth remembering that there are certain things that are only important to the client. In this case, Sony really does hate crossplay. They want to make sure that their films are only available on their channels, but the media that they release on those channels is very important to the consumer. They can make the choice to only allow access to certain media types but they can’t make them not important to the consumer.

The problem is that Sony has done nothing to ensure that their films are always available for their customers. In fact, they even tried to block the video streaming on Netflix and Hulu. Not that it stopped them from streaming the shows they wanted to, but they were only willing to show their content on their own channels. So this is one of those cases where the client is the primary decision maker. They have the final say.

This is the kind of thing that makes me question Sony’s future. If they could get away with it, if they could just show their movies without having to make concessions to the content owners, it’s hard to imagine what they would do now. They have a new generation of executives who are more concerned about the bottom line than they are about the consumer.

I’m not trying to say that Sony’s behavior was unethical, but the fact that they actively tried to stop their own customers from viewing their movies shows an attitude that can’t be tolerated.

Sony has long been a company that is concerned about how their customers view their products. In fact, Sony started as a company that was concerned about the quality of its movies. In the early days, Sony didn’t care much about what movies they made, but that changed once they started releasing movies that were not as good as the ones they had originally been made for. Sony just wanted to get their movies into people’s homes.

Sony’s attitude has gotten worse since they began producing movies that were not as good as the ones they had originally been made for, but one of their biggest problems has been that they still dont know how to get the movies to people. Sony’s attitude is that they don’t care how good a movie is, as long as their company image is good. That’s why they have a wide array of movies that arent as good as they claim they are.

Sony just tried to make their movies as good as possible, so what they actually care about are the reviews. They have their own internal review system, and that’s why they dont have a good rating system for their movies. However, since they sell their movies for hundreds of dollars and are willing to pay hundreds of dollars to gain a good rating, they can easily make a movie that isnt good enough to get a good review.

One example of a movie that wasnt as good as they claimed it was is the The Last Airbender movie. The movie wasnt perfect, but it looked good enough to get a good review from the studio. However, at the end of the day, it wasnt a good movie to get a good review.

sony did not like the fact that the movie was going to be released in multiple languages. The fact that they made the movie in English, and that we are all fluent in English, allowed the makers to use the language of the target audience. It wasnt a good idea to release a movie without the target audience having the correct language. When a movie is released to the public, the target audience must be able to read the story.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here