chicago news today shooting

The Chicago news story this morning about a Chicago police officer shooting a man who was firing at them was heartbreaking. The police officer, who was doing his job, had to be physically restrained from firing his weapon.

The Chicago police officer was doing his job, but a Chicago cop who was trying to kill him was being trained to shoot his gun with a laser sight. This makes me think that there’s a “training disparity” because the shooter is trained to shoot with a laser sight.

It seems that this officer was trained by an officer from the FBI, when he was in the military. The training officer would have been in the FBI since he was a military officer. The Chicago police officer was trained by the Chicago police officer who is now a decorated police officer in Chicago. I’m sure the two officers have a lot in common.

I bet you that if you were the police officer in Chicago, you wouldn’t have spent the night in jail. The Chicago police officer is currently on administrative leave (and is currently an active duty police officer), and I bet that if you were the police officer in Chicago, you would have taken him out on the street and shot him.

The police officer in Chicago may be on administrative leave, but his status as a decorated police officer in Chicago is not. He was a decorated police officer in Chicago, and now he has no active duty police officers to take out. That’s exactly the kind of police officer we want to see in Chicago. He should be the man who takes out the bad cops in Chicago.

That is exactly why police officers need to be re-elected every 4 years. They get to do some nice police work, and when they retire they get to become cops! The police department needs cops who are re-elected every 4 years. It doesn’t have to be every four years, but each time they get re-elected, they could be a little more aggressive in bringing down police corruption.

Speaking of corruption, today the Chicago police department announced that they would be ending the practice of hiring convicted criminals for their jobs. The department has been looking for ways to reduce the use of felons in the department, including hiring people who are incarcerated, but its new president, Eddie Johnson, said that this is not the best way to go. Its a good idea to get them out of the equation, but it does seem to be a good idea.

I have to admit that I thought it was a good idea to get them out of the equation. In the video above, Johnson says, “I think we have to get that out of people’s mind.” But I feel like the same thing could be said of the cops in Chicago. So it seems that Johnson may be trying to get out of the equation, but only by changing the problem. I still don’t like the idea of criminalizing the police.

I still dont like the idea of criminalizing the police. I think that we should be able to help people who need help. Crime is bad, and the police are there to help people and not to put people in jail. If we want to help people we should be able to help people. It seems Johnson is trying to change the problem by getting the problem into the minds of criminals, which may result in less crime overall, but I still dont like the idea of criminalizing law enforcement.

And even if there’s a correlation between crime and the police, crime is also a complex problem. I think the police are doing a great job and I wouldn’t want them to be doing anything else. But I also think that they are also trying to do something that’s not helpful. They’re trying to help people by making them feel safe, while at the same time criminalizing them.